Does this paper sound like you?
Reviewers are getting better at recognizing AI-assisted writing. The tells are specific ā€” and most have nothing to do with whether your data are accurate.
Tell #1? Language that performs expertise without quite landing it.
Grab my 25-point self-audit, built from my own experience as a peer reviewer.
Because the question isn't whether you used AI. It's whether the manuscript still sounds like a scientist.
